Dear Mr. Hawes & Ron Paul
Firstly I want to say I truly appreciate the statement...
"Dissent is true Patriotism"
I have a fundamental question that affects millions of americans in many ways. And could very well rally another group of active individuals behind you.
My Question is in regards to HIV and AIDS... There are many qualified Scientists and Doctors who for years now have had many questions in regards to the current Hypothesis. They have much scientific evidence that questions the current mainstream idea and treatments. For me a knowlegable researcher it has logically caused me to question things also... The people are labelled Dissidents shut out of discussions and labelled as quacks. Despite thier credentials, thier previous backing on other subjects, and in many cases awards and notoriety, along with the amount of mounting evidence they hold. They have simply been calling for many years for a platform to open up debate on the subject. To no avail.
My feeling is if they are sooo wrong in thier questions the debate should be opened and be allowed to be explored. The fact that it is not allowed leaves me with the concern that maybe these other sides with billions of personal interests... medical, pharmacuetical, not to mention the legal ramifications... are refusing to allow it for fear they might just be proven wrong.
So I guess my question is...
What would Ron Paul do to ensure the integrity of science and medicine by allowing unconventional yet scientifically backed questions to be broached publicly and would he encourage them when thier are millions of lives at stake. Descrimination, Isolation, Manipulation, Toxic Drugs, Children are taken, etc etc. All by people who simply question the mainstream, and wish to have a choice in the risks they take with thier health. Even though the truth may not be as profitable as the accepted concept. And the fact that it may expose big mistakes on the part of the medical industry etc etc.
Its just so strange to me... because on the surface... immune disfunction in certain demographics and populations is not really worthy of being labelled a disease... as it is a by product... yes the fact that we are being poisoned from all kinds of directions (food/drugs/water) is a bit of an epedimic... but they keep discovering that people with HIV live longer and longer... and healthier lives... some are totally immune... never progress to aids... and the drugs are even called toxic and dangerous by the same doctors who prescribe them. Reputable scientists within the accepted hypothesis even admit that there are so many inconsistencies... and those that do die horribly seem to have many lifestyle factors involved in that particular reality...
So whats wrong with science that the questions that create major innovations and breakthroughs are no longer allowed or acceptable... particularly when they are not widely accepted by the financially based status quo.
You response will be greatly appreciated and I will be posting and forwarding this letter to many people who have similar concerns and questions. It would be a tremendous service to those caught up in the HIV/AIDS machine (a 300 billion dollar a year industry) to know that a simple debate on the subject would be encouraged and allowed... as they need some facts... and at the moment there are too many holes and inconsistencies.
Sincerely,
Your loyal voter
Jessica Irwin
Firstly I want to say I truly appreciate the statement...
"Dissent is true Patriotism"
I have a fundamental question that affects millions of americans in many ways. And could very well rally another group of active individuals behind you.
My Question is in regards to HIV and AIDS... There are many qualified Scientists and Doctors who for years now have had many questions in regards to the current Hypothesis. They have much scientific evidence that questions the current mainstream idea and treatments. For me a knowlegable researcher it has logically caused me to question things also... The people are labelled Dissidents shut out of discussions and labelled as quacks. Despite thier credentials, thier previous backing on other subjects, and in many cases awards and notoriety, along with the amount of mounting evidence they hold. They have simply been calling for many years for a platform to open up debate on the subject. To no avail.
My feeling is if they are sooo wrong in thier questions the debate should be opened and be allowed to be explored. The fact that it is not allowed leaves me with the concern that maybe these other sides with billions of personal interests... medical, pharmacuetical, not to mention the legal ramifications... are refusing to allow it for fear they might just be proven wrong.
So I guess my question is...
What would Ron Paul do to ensure the integrity of science and medicine by allowing unconventional yet scientifically backed questions to be broached publicly and would he encourage them when thier are millions of lives at stake. Descrimination, Isolation, Manipulation, Toxic Drugs, Children are taken, etc etc. All by people who simply question the mainstream, and wish to have a choice in the risks they take with thier health. Even though the truth may not be as profitable as the accepted concept. And the fact that it may expose big mistakes on the part of the medical industry etc etc.
Its just so strange to me... because on the surface... immune disfunction in certain demographics and populations is not really worthy of being labelled a disease... as it is a by product... yes the fact that we are being poisoned from all kinds of directions (food/drugs/water) is a bit of an epedimic... but they keep discovering that people with HIV live longer and longer... and healthier lives... some are totally immune... never progress to aids... and the drugs are even called toxic and dangerous by the same doctors who prescribe them. Reputable scientists within the accepted hypothesis even admit that there are so many inconsistencies... and those that do die horribly seem to have many lifestyle factors involved in that particular reality...
So whats wrong with science that the questions that create major innovations and breakthroughs are no longer allowed or acceptable... particularly when they are not widely accepted by the financially based status quo.
You response will be greatly appreciated and I will be posting and forwarding this letter to many people who have similar concerns and questions. It would be a tremendous service to those caught up in the HIV/AIDS machine (a 300 billion dollar a year industry) to know that a simple debate on the subject would be encouraged and allowed... as they need some facts... and at the moment there are too many holes and inconsistencies.
Sincerely,
Your loyal voter
Jessica Irwin
posted by:
|
Montana
|
